1.pretext: On June 25-26, a brawl broke out between migrant Uyghurs and Han Chinese at Xuri Toy Factory in Shaguan, Guangdong, resulting in the death of 2 Uyghurs and 118 others injured. The trigger was officially established as a false rumor saying that some Uyghurs had sexually assaulted Han girls.
2.On July 5 evening, a peaceful protest started demanding a just and proper handling of the above case. The size of the crowd is not consistent across reports, but one can see for himself/herself here
3.The police cleared the crowd, and about 70 protesters were arrested.
4.Some of those that dispersed regrouped.
5.Violence, vandalism, looting, and arson started later. Uyghurs smashed and burnt buses, beat and killed Han Chinese bystanders and in some cases people in their homes
6.Internet was blocked, and cell phone service largely discontinued. The government actively censored anything related to the riots on the internet
7.Police was reinforced and quickly controlled the situation.
8.The official casualty count by Xinhua, China's state news agency, is 156 people killed and 1080 injured. Update: on July 11 Xinjiang time, the toll is raised to 184
9.A curfew was imposed and riot police forces patrolled the city
10.On July 6, the police arrested some 1400 Uyghur men for interrogation
11.On July 7 many Han Chinese came together welding home made weapons, swearing revenge. Riot police stopped their advancing to the Uyghur side of neighborhood using guard rails, tear gas, and persuasion.
12. On Friday July 1o all Mosques were ordered to be closed, but crowds of Uyghurs gathered outside few of the Mosques. The Police at the end opened them for worship.
2.On July 5 evening, a peaceful protest started demanding a just and proper handling of the above case. The size of the crowd is not consistent across reports, but one can see for himself/herself here
3.The police cleared the crowd, and about 70 protesters were arrested.
4.Some of those that dispersed regrouped.
5.Violence, vandalism, looting, and arson started later. Uyghurs smashed and burnt buses, beat and killed Han Chinese bystanders and in some cases people in their homes
6.Internet was blocked, and cell phone service largely discontinued. The government actively censored anything related to the riots on the internet
7.Police was reinforced and quickly controlled the situation.
8.The official casualty count by Xinhua, China's state news agency, is 156 people killed and 1080 injured. Update: on July 11 Xinjiang time, the toll is raised to 184
9.A curfew was imposed and riot police forces patrolled the city
10.On July 6, the police arrested some 1400 Uyghur men for interrogation
11.On July 7 many Han Chinese came together welding home made weapons, swearing revenge. Riot police stopped their advancing to the Uyghur side of neighborhood using guard rails, tear gas, and persuasion.
12. On Friday July 1o all Mosques were ordered to be closed, but crowds of Uyghurs gathered outside few of the Mosques. The Police at the end opened them for worship.
I hope that was informative as neutrally possible. Now with the above firmly established in your mind, you should be ready for some facts of partial nature
1.This video is perhaps the most demonstrative of the havoc wreaked, but since it does not consider the Uyghur's motives, taken by itself one can argue it's tilted toward the Hans
2.World Uyghur Congress and its president Rebiya Kadeer have said in one way or another the following things:
I.Uyghurs were beaten and shot to death by Chinese Police, confirmed by witnesses
i.counter facts: Among the injured and dead, very few were Uyghur and very few were found with bullet wounds.
II.Kadeer admitted to calling on Uyghurs to rise as charged by the Chinese government
III.Chinese authorities always blame internal problems on external forces such as WUC
IV.demonstrators were not separatists and many carried the Chinese flag
V.10,000 Han Chinese had beat and killed 60 Uyghurs in the June 26 violence listed above as “pretext” (exclusive interview with Kadeer on Channel 4)
i.As the numbers above illustrate, this is quite far from the truth. Also 10000 to 60 seems like overkill; if truly happened, it was mysteriously overlooked by Western media
VI.Kadeer used a photo to illustrate the cruelty imposed by Chinese police, but the photo was actually taken on June 26 at another place.
3.The Chinese government has accused WUC as instigating violence at home and labels it as one of the worst terrorist groups
4.It also insists that the violence was planned by separatists and terrorists
5.International response was generally “both sides must show restraint”
6.Chinese premier Hu Jintao canceled his G8 tour to come back and deal with the situation
7.The western media was surprised by the openness toward western reporters and the speed with which reports went up
8.There is at least one family that was incarcerated alive with their house, and another invaded in their homes and beheaded. Witnesses told about innocent Hans being dragged to back alleys and mutilated, and some 50 of the dead were found in dark backstreets
9.Present-day Xinjiang has a highly diverse population with 45% Uyghurs, 40% Hans, and 15% other minorities. Its capital, Urumqi, contains 75% Han, 12.8% Uyghurs, and 10% other minorities.
2.World Uyghur Congress and its president Rebiya Kadeer have said in one way or another the following things:
I.Uyghurs were beaten and shot to death by Chinese Police, confirmed by witnesses
i.counter facts: Among the injured and dead, very few were Uyghur and very few were found with bullet wounds.
II.Kadeer admitted to calling on Uyghurs to rise as charged by the Chinese government
III.Chinese authorities always blame internal problems on external forces such as WUC
IV.demonstrators were not separatists and many carried the Chinese flag
V.10,000 Han Chinese had beat and killed 60 Uyghurs in the June 26 violence listed above as “pretext” (exclusive interview with Kadeer on Channel 4)
i.As the numbers above illustrate, this is quite far from the truth. Also 10000 to 60 seems like overkill; if truly happened, it was mysteriously overlooked by Western media
VI.Kadeer used a photo to illustrate the cruelty imposed by Chinese police, but the photo was actually taken on June 26 at another place.
3.The Chinese government has accused WUC as instigating violence at home and labels it as one of the worst terrorist groups
4.It also insists that the violence was planned by separatists and terrorists
5.International response was generally “both sides must show restraint”
6.Chinese premier Hu Jintao canceled his G8 tour to come back and deal with the situation
7.The western media was surprised by the openness toward western reporters and the speed with which reports went up
8.There is at least one family that was incarcerated alive with their house, and another invaded in their homes and beheaded. Witnesses told about innocent Hans being dragged to back alleys and mutilated, and some 50 of the dead were found in dark backstreets
9.Present-day Xinjiang has a highly diverse population with 45% Uyghurs, 40% Hans, and 15% other minorities. Its capital, Urumqi, contains 75% Han, 12.8% Uyghurs, and 10% other minorities.
Alright, here's my interpretations on the event, and as such, it is absolutely subject to my own biases.
Regarding all the western reports out there and debaters about the evils of Chinese bureaucracy, I want to remind you that this is at its heart still a human tragedy, where friends, relatives, parents and children were lost. Sometimes reading the hyper-politicization of those reports and debates I feel as if the western journalists don't care much about how much people suffered but only what their suffering would mean to the political arenas.
China has done a significantly better job in allowing foreign media greater access. The move can be argued by both sides: Opponents of China can say that it opened up only because the violence was incurred by the Uyghurs, and in doing so it gains the sympathy of the world; supporters can say that this is what the western media wants and the state gave it to them. Nevertheless, the invitation of western reporters and the quickness with which China published the relevant data helped demystify the situation and deconstruct part of the conception of the Chinese tyranny. For example, reporters now can show to the world the excellent policing done by the Chinese in times of turmoil. Contrary to what most westerners would believe, the police did not brutally beat and kill Uyghur protesters even when some of them were committing vandalism, looting, and even murder. In fact, one policeman was killed in reverse. However, the news also showed to the world the savagery of the minority group. While they definitely deserved to vent their anger over the June 25 event and more importantly the inequities between Uyghurs and Hans, the escalating violence only detracted from their cause. This combined with the obvious contradictions of WUC and Rebiya Kadeer may temporarily take away their credibility.
On the other hand, China still does not admit the problems in Xinjiang. These problems include uneven economic growth between Han and the minorities, the minorities' lack of rights, and the Hans' smothering of their culture by flooding their cities with people of Han ethnicity. Though the officially Chinese policies toward minorities have been “reverse discrimination” like in college admissions and police stations and encouragement of multiple children in contrast to the “one-child policy” applied to urban Han Chinese, the locals have quietly and maybe even unconsciously divided along a schism into the 2 camps of Hans and the Uyghurs at Urumqi and other cities. Perhaps this is only natural like how an oil drop behaves in water: like dissolves like, otherwise segregation results. We can find plenty of comparisons in Black histories before the Civil Rights Movement and after WWI in the US, in which the Great Migration pushed millions of southern Blacks toward northern cities, but widespread racism forced them to settle in the cities' innermost where pollutions were the worst. The similarities continue with the low employment rates, social status, and economic prosperity despite favorable laws. Thus, the problems' roots lie not directly in the government, as in both cases, but in the prevailing prejudices deep-seated in the majority group's culture and media; however, the responsibility of fixing the disparities absolutely lies in the government. With great effort from leaders like Kennedy, King, and LBJ and millions of civil right activists, laws were fixed and bigotry was healed over time. Perhaps similar actions might produce similar results? Well, the laws are the easy part for the one-party Chinese government, but the people part is a lot more difficult if the only pushing exerted is by the bureaucracy; and if the people part is not done, no matter how many legislations are enacted, revised, or destroyed, riots like the 7.5 incident will happen again and again in increasing severity --- Heck, even now the US has not seen the end of racial unrest. The people in Xinjiang need to reconcile and reestablish mutual trust and protect the next generation from continuing the feud.
Now let's come back to the present reality. That the violence in a distant city in Shandong can cause the near destruction of the capital of Xinjiang and more importantly of a longlasting stability in its society tells about the volatility of the ethnicities in China which has been exacerbated by the incident. It does not bode well at all for Uyghurs' reputation at home and in the world – the former might incite revenges from the Hans while the latter renders them less international support against true injustices. As it stands now, the future seems uneasy until we forget about this incident.
I have mentioned in my previous post that the recent years in China are its own Era of Good Feelings in which economic prosperity and heartfelt nationalism shadows potential problems in wide areas. This breakout in violence may very well be one of the first rocks that surface when the tide ebbs in the form of global recession. Indeed as I said above, the Uyghurs complained about the unequal economic status between them and the neighboring Hans. But even the industrial setting of the precursor event somewhat suggests the the role of recession in these doings. I wouldn't be surprised if job losses from the economic crisis left quite a few Uyghurs with little to do other than to shift their attentions to previously not-as-conspicuous problems and, riding on the anger generated by the recent June-25 event, organize the march that started it all.